ABSTRACT
Objectives: We present a case report of medical intensivist driven ECMO program using ECMO as a pre-procedural tool to maintain oxygenation in a patient with critical tracheal stenosis during tracheostomy placement. Method(s): VV ECMO is primarily used to support patients when mechanical ventilation is unable to provide adequate gas exchange. Alternatively, it has been used pre-procedurally when intubation is required in anticipation of a difficult airway. Described here is the first intensivist preformed awake VV ECMO cannulation to facilitate tracheostomy in a patient with severe tracheal stenosis. Result(s): The patient is a 41-year-old female with the relevant background of COVID19 pneumonia status post tracheostomy and subsequently decannulated after prolonged intubation and ICU stay. As a result, the patient developed symptomatic tracheal stenosis and presented two years after her ICU stay for scheduled bronchoscopy and balloon dilation. However, the patient developed worsening stridor and shortness of breath requiring heliox and BPAP. After multidisciplinary discussion between the critical care team ENT teams, the decision was made to cannulate for VV ECMO as a pre-procedural maneuver to allow for oxygenation during open tracheostomy in the OR. Dexmedetomidine and local anesthesia were used for the procedure with the patient sitting at 30 degrees on non-invasive ventilation and heliox. The patient was cannulated with a 21F right internal jugular return cannula and 25F right common femoral drainage cannula by medical intensivists in the intensive care unit using ultrasound guidance. The patient went for operative tracheostomy the next day and was subsequently decannulated from ECMO the following day without complication. She was discharged home on trach collar. Conclusion(s): Intensivist performed ECMO cannulation has been shown to be safe and effective. We anticipate the indications and use will continue to expand. This case is an example that intensivist driven preprocedural ECMO is a viable extension of that practice.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Reporting a case of a COVID-19 vaccinated patient admitted to our intensive care unit with severe acute respiratory failure due to SARSCoV2 - Omicron variant, rapidly deteriorating requiring intubation, prone ventilation, and ECMO support. Method(s): A 62 years old Caucasian male was admitted in ICU for rapidly deranging respiratory failure and fever which occurred over the previous 24h. The patient received two doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine (Oxford, AstraZeneca), the last one over five months before onset of symptoms. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with tachypnea, low peripheral saturation (80%), elevated serum creatinine (2.4 mg/dl), and mild obesity (BMI 34,6). Pressure support ventilation trial (2 hours) failed carryng out to orotracheal intubation and protective ventilation. Worsening of respiratory exchanges (5 th day from the admission) required a rescue prone ventilation cycle, in the meantime an indication was given to the placement of veno-venous ECMO. The cannulation site was femoro-femoral and the configuration used was Vivc25- Va21, according to the current ELSO nomenclature;ECMO flow was progressively increased until a peripheral saturation of 95% was obtained. Result(s): The patient passed out after 2 month of extracorporeal support with no sign of recovery of pulmonary and renal function. Conclusion(s): Unlike evidences showing a lower symptomatic engagement of the Omicron variant SARSCoV2 positive patients, we have witnessed a rapid and massive pulmonary involvement. The short time that passed from the onset of symptoms and the rapid decay of respiratory function required rapid escalation of the intensity of care up to extracorporeal support. The patient showed previous pathologies that can lead to suspicion of a loss of immune coverage given by the vaccine, in addition to the long time elapsed since the last dose. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Implementation of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VVECMO) allowed survival of patients with severe respiratory failure associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, VVECMO treatment is usually associated with long ICU stays, prolonged sedation, and neuromuscular blockage days. Functional disability, due to delirium and acquired muscle weakness, is frequently an inevitable burden causing long term disability. This study aims to analyse main characteristics of patients under ECMO due to COVID-19 pneumonia, their outcomes and functional status six months after ICU discharge. Method(s): Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database in an ECMO referral centre. All patients receiving VVECMO for SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Epidemiological and clinical data were reviewed. Functional status at 6 months after ICU discharge was assessed with modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Result(s): Ninety-three patients were included (29% female). Median age was 54+/-12 years, mean SOFA was 5.7+/-2.9, mean SAPS II was 35.6+/-13.6. Mean time from intubation to cannulation was 5+/-5.6 days in 91 patients;awake-ECMO was performed in 2 patients. Mean ECMO run duration was 33.1+/-30 days (longest ECMO run was 194 days). A period of awake-ECMO was performed on 36.5% of patients, during 16.4+/-21.2 days. ICU-acquired weakness was diagnosed on 64.5% of patients and delirium on 63.4%. Mortality was 24.7% (23 patients) with only 1 patient deceased in hospital after ICU discharge. At 6 months follow-up, all patients were still alive and most of them (65.1%) were independent on all daily activities (mRS <= 2). Conclusion(s): Patients with severe COVID-19 treated with VVECMO support had very good functional outcomes at six-month follow-up. Despite long ICU length-of-stay, high incidence of delirium and acquired muscle weakness, full recovery at six-month post-ICU discharge was achievable in most patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Several pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines involved in COVID-19 and it is reasonable to speculate that their removal from blood might limit organ damage. Hemoperfusion with CytoSorb is a technique developed to adsorb molecules in the middle molecular weight range (up to 55 kDa). Studies in vitro and in vivo have shown that HP is highly effective in clearing blood from a number of cytokines. Method(s): We report a case series of 9 consecutive COVID-patients admitted to our COVID Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Five of them were treated with HP using CytoSorb (T), due to the heavy emergency overload it was impossible to deliver blood purification in the other 4 patients (C), who were also considered as potential candidates by the attending medical team. All patients had pneumonia and respiratory failure requiring continuous positive airway pressure. Different antibacterial prophylaxes, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory therapies including steroids were delivered. Result(s): Our results show a better clinical course of T compared to control patients (C), in fact all T except 1 survived, and only 2 of them were intubated, while all C required intubation and died. CRP decreased in both groups, but to a greater extent after HP. Lymphocytopenia worsened in control patient but not in treated patient after HP. Procalcitonin increased in 2 of the not treated patients. In all survived patients (n = 4) HP reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines, as IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-8. Notably, a striking effect was observed on IL-6 levels that at the end of the second session were decreased by a 40% than before the first treatment. Serum levels of IL-8 and TNF-alpha were lowered within normal range. In all patients the treatment was safe and there were no complications. Conclusion(s): Our study suggests a potential efficacy of HP in an early phase of viral infection not only for improving survival in the treated patients but also by the remodeling treatment-associated cytokine levels.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: In patients with severe respiratory failure, invasive ventilation may deteriorate the pneumomediastinum and hypoxia. This study aimed to compare the mortality and the complications of the patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related severe ARDS treated with invasive ventilation or veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) to avoid intubation. We hypothesized that VV-ECMO support without prior intubation is a feasible alternative strategy to invasive ventilation. Method(s): This retrospective study evaluated patients with COVID-19 related severe respiratory failure and radiological evidence of pneumomediastinum. The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) survival at 90 days. Result(s): Out of 347 patients with COVID-19 disease treated in our unit, 22 patients developed spontaneous pneumomediastinum associated with deterioration of respiratory function. In 13 patients (59%), invasive ventilation was chosen as initial respiratory support;in 9 patients (41%), VV-ECMO was chosen as initial respiratory support. The median age of the patients in the invasive ventilation group was 62 years (IQR: 49-69) compared to 53 years (IQR: 46-62) in ECMO group (P=0.31). No statistically significant difference in SAPS II score between the groups was observed (39.7 (IQR: 33.2-45.3) vs. 28.9 (IQR:28.4-34.6), P=0.06). No elevated fluid balance within the first 4 days was observed in the ECMO group compared to the invasive ventilation group (162 mL (IQR: -366-2000) vs. 3905 mL (IQR: 2068-6192), P=0.07). VV-ECMO as the initial strategy for supporting patients with severe respiratory failure and pneumomediastinum, was associated with lower 90 days mortality (HR: 0.33 95%-CI: 0.11-0.97, P= 0.04) compared to patients treated with invasive ventilation (Figure). Conclusion(s): VV-ECMO can be an alternative strategy to invasive ventilation for treating patients with severe respiratory failure and spontaneous pneumomediastinum. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created severe medical and economic consequences worldwide since 2019. Tocilizumab is one of the therapies considered capable of improving the condition of patients with COVID-19. However, there is not much information about the best time to give tocilizumab. METHOD(S): This was an analytical study with a retrospective cohort design, using the data of 125 patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome in Dr. Moewardi Hospital, Surakarta, from March to August 2020. We analyzed various available clinical data to see which factors into clinical improvement with tocilizumab therapy. RESULT(S): Most patients showed clinical improvement after administration of tocilizumab. During the follow-up period, 21 patients died despite tocilizumab therapy. Significant risk factors associated with the need for intubation were heart rate, neutrophil, lymphocyte, pH, PaCO2, and PO2. The most influential variable on the need for intubation without being associated with other risk factors was PaO2 (p = 0.003, Confidence Intervals 95%). CONCLUSION(S): Tocilizumab has a role in treating patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, preventing the need for intubation when given to patients in good saturation condition with oxygen supplementation without positive pressure (PaO2 >65mmHg;SpO2 >93%).Copyright © 2023 Septian Adi Permana, Adhrie Sugiarto, Sidharta Kusuma Manggala, Muhammad Husni Thamrin, Purwoko Purwoko, Handayu Ganitafuri.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: During COVID pandemic, ECMO support for the patients with ARDS have saved many lives. Although its an important and effective treatment modality, management of ECMO could be done in a few specialized centers. In this study, we share our in- and out-of-city ECMO transport experience of the patients with COVID-ARDS. Method(s): A total of 75 patients (57% male- 43 %female) were included in this study. The decision ECMO support, initiation at referral hospital, and transport process of all of the patients to our centre were performed by our mobile ECMO team. All transports were done by land ambulance Results: Mean age of the patients was 43.4+/-11.5 years. Mean intubation period before ECMO support was 8.5 +/-8.3 days. We transferred 14 patients from the centers within the city and 12 patients from the centers outside the city to our hospital. Mean distance between our center and the referral center was 36,2 kms (max 269- min 1). We did not experience any major complication during transport. A total of 30 patients (38,6 %) were weaned from ECMO and discharged from hospital. Conclusion(s): ECMO support is an advanced treatment modality for pulmonary failure patients. The decision of initiation, cannulation, transport and management should be performed by experienced centers to achive acceptable results.
ABSTRACT
Background: The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant demand for beds capable of delivering enhanced respiratory support. NHS England recommended the use of CPAP for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, a treatment which can be offered outside of a critical care facility, and on a Respiratory High Care/ Support Unit (RSU). The enhancement of Portsmouth's RSU provided CPAP and NIV for patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. With our intensive care facilities at 300% their normal capacity, this greatly alleviated bed pressures on critical care. Varied levels of deprivation exist in Portsmouth's dense population. Deprivation has an impact on overall health, however the effect of postcode on outcomes for people going onto support for COVID-19 respiratory failure, is unknown. Method(s): Retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients admitted to Respiratory Support Unit during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, from 02/11/2020 to 31/01/2021. 227 patients were included in the study with 8 removed due to incomplete data, all of the patients received respiratory support in the form of CPAP or NIV. We collected multivariate data including biochemical markers, demographics, oxygenation status, co-morbidities and outcomes. Outcomes measured were: 1) Death in RSU, 2) Discharge from RSU or 3) Intubation and Ventilation. To measure deprivation, we linked a persons postcode to an area called an LSOA (Lower-layer Super Output Area). These are small areas of similar population size, each of which has a deprivation score (ie. top 10%, to the lowest 10% areas of deprivation in the UK). This is measured using an 'index of multiple deprivation'. An individual's outcome from the RSU was then analysed in relation to the deprivation score allocated to their postcode. Result(s): We observed a significant number of patients discharged from RSU, without needing invasive mechanical ventilation. 80/219 were discharged directly. 45/219 died in RSU, and 94 were eventually admitted to ITU. The average stay on CPAP or NIV before needing admission to ITU was 3 days. Some biochemical markers which stood out in relation to the outcomes described were as follows: average LDH, D-dimer and Troponin levels were higher in those who were admitted to intensive care. In patients who died, the PCT was significantly higher on average when compared to the other two groups. In the group who were discharged, mean lymphocyte count was >1, in the other two groups this was <1. From our observations in Portsmouth, there is a negative correlation between deprivation and lower aged individuals admitted for COVID-19 related respiratory support. Overall, we also saw disproportionate representation of those from the most deprived 50% of the UK in our respiratory support unit. Conclusion(s): CPAP and NIV can effectively be used in an RSU during a spike of COVID-19, to safely minimise demand on critical care services. Deprivation may have an impact on outcomes in patients needing respiratory support related to COVID-19. Deprivation levels may help predict risk of needing enhanced respiratory support in certain age groups. Multiple biochemical markers may be of prognostic value in COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic an estimated 5000 surgical and 12000 percutaneous tracheostomies were completed in the UK each year.1 A UK study looking at COVID-19 tracheostomy outcomes found 1605 tracheostomy cases from 126 hospital, median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 15 days while 285 (18%) patients died following the procedure.2 COVID-19 patients also typically spend longer in critical care with prolonged time receiving organ support when compared to patients diagnosed with other viral pneumonias.3 Incidence of laryngeal pathologies are also higher in COVID-19 patients post tracheostomy.4 Objectives: The aim of this observational study was to review the outcomes of patients post tracheostomy insertion during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to non-COVID patients. Method(s): A service evaluation was completed including all patients requiring a tracheostomy since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 within University Hospital Wales, Cardiff. Data was captured from local tracheostomy databases. Patients were grouped into either COVID or non-COVID based on their clinical history. The key outcomes evaluated were number of tracheostomies, average time to cuff deflation and decannulation, critical care and hospital length of stay, occurrence of adverse events and time from critical care admission to tracheostomy insertion. Data was evaluated using descriptive statistics using Microsoft ExcelTM. Result(s): During the review period 58 patients with COVID-19 and 158 without required a tracheostomy. In the COVID-19 group cuff deflation occurred at a median of 10 days post insertion compared to 7 days. Decannulation occurred at a median of 16 days in patients with COVID-19 compared to 18 days. The rate of decannulation was also higher in the COVID-19 group at 74.1% compared to 67.1%. Critical care length of stay was 37 days in the COVID-19 compared to 25 days. Time from intubation to tracheostomy was comparable between groups at a median of 16 days for our COVID-19 cohort compared to 15 days. The incidence of clinical incidents was higher in the non-COVID-19 group at 10.1% compared to 5.2%. Conclusion(s): This internal service evaluation has shown that COVID-19 patients typically spend longer in critical care but their time to decannulation was shorter and their rate of decannulation was higher in our cohort then in the comparison group. This could be due to the tertiary neuroscience and major trauma specialities within our Health Board. Both with groups of patients that, due to the nature of their injuries may require prolonged periods of tracheostomy insertion even after critical care discharge.
ABSTRACT
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that needs immediate diagnosis and treatment to maximize the chances of survival. Bacterial superinfection is a severe and frequent complication among COVID-19 patients and its diagnosis is challenging. Previous reports suggested that Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) may be a predictive biomarker for sepsis in critically ill patients. We report a case series of three COVID- 19 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) with risk of sepsis. Method(s): We daily monitored PSP, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in three COVID- 19 patients admitted to our ICU. Microbiological sampling and antibiotic treatment were performed according to the ward organization and in case of clinical suspects for infection. Positive cultures and antibiotic treatment were retrieved from clinical charts and patients were followed from ICU admission up to a maximum of 20 days. Result(s): Patient 1 (male, 55 years-old, overweight, no other comorbidity) was admitted to the ICU in treatment with Ceftriaxone then interrupted on day 7. On day 2 he was intubated and piperacillin/tazobactam was started on day 12 for suspected hospital acquired pneumonia. PSP levels markedly increased on day 10 with no significant changes in CRP and PCT levels. On day 13 a positive bronchospirate for Klebsiella pneumoniae was found. Similarly, patient 2 (male, 70 years-old, mild emphysema and diabetes) was admitted to ICU without antibiotic and with a PSP level of 287 ng/ml. His conditions rapidly worsened in severe septic shock requiring intubation. CRP markedly raised 48-72 hours after PSP with only mild increase of PCT. Patient 3 (male, 78 years-old, no comorbidities) was admitted to ICU with high levels of PSP and piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was started. After 48-72 hours CRP levels increased with no significant changes of PCT. A positive bronchospirate for Ps. aeruginosa was collected on day 3. Conclusion(s): Our findings suggest a potential role of PSP as early biomarker of sepsis in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Daily PSP monitoring may anticipate an appropriate treatment of COVID-19 patients with a septic complication in comparison with the actual laboratory markers. Further studies are needed to confirm our hypothesis.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The people worldwide have been affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection since its appearance in December, 2019. Kawasaki disease-like hyperinflammatory shock associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously healthy children has been reported in the literature, which is now referred to as a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Some aspects of MIS-C are similar to those of Kawasaki disease, toxic shock syndrome, secondary hemophagocytic syndrome, and macrophage activation syndrome. Case Presentation: This study reported an 11-year-old boy with MIS-C presented with periorbital and peripheral edema, abdominal pain, elevated liver enzymes, severe right pleural effusion, moderate ascites, and severe failure of right and left ventricles. Conclusion(s): Due to the increasing number of reported cases of critically ill patients afflicted with MIS-C and its life-threatening complications, it was recommended that further studies should be carried out in order to provide screening tests for myocardial dysfunction. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach was found inevitable.Copyright © 2023, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: Genetic variants affecting host defense against pathogens may help explain COVID-19 fatal outcomes. Our aim was to identify rare genetic variants related to COVID-19 severity in a selected group of patients under 60 years who required intubation or resulting in death. Method(s): Forty-four very severe COVID-19 patients were selected from the Spanish STOP-Coronavirus cohort, which comprises more than 3,500 COVID-19 patients. Genotype was performed by whole exome sequencing and variants were selected by using a gene panel of 867 candidate genes (immune response, primary immunodeficiencies or coagulation, among other). Variants were filtered, priorized and their potential pathogenicity was assessed following ACGM criteria. Result(s): We detected 44 different variants of interest, in 29 different patients (66%). Some of these variants were previously described as pathogenic (26%). Mostly, the candidate variants were located in genes related to immune response (38%), congenital disorders of glycosylation (14%) or damaged DNA binding genes (9%). A network analysis, showed three main components, consisting of 25 highly interconnected genes related to immune response and two additional networks enriched in carbohydrate metabolism and in DNA metabolism and repair processes. Conclusion(s): The variants identified affect different, but interrelated, functional pathways such as immune response and glycosylation. Further studies are needed for confirming the ultimate role of the new candidate genes described in the present study on COVID-19 severity.
ABSTRACT
Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading cause of death in hospitalized patients with severe forms of COVID-19. At the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic the starting respiratory protocol suggested early use of intubation and artificial lung ventilation (ALV) in patients with severe pneumonia complicated by ARF. However, after the analysis of the published studies it was noted that the pathophysiology of the development of ARF in COVID-19 had features that determine the atypical clinical pattern - "silent hypoxemia". This leads to the late onset of respiratory support (RS) and, as a result, to the lower effectiveness of non-invasive RS methods. This article discusses the creation of an algorithm for the early use of various non-invasive RS methods in patients with COVID-19 complicated by ARF, that will decrease the frequency of hospitalization to the Intensive care units, tracheal intubation and ALV, reduce the duration of treatment and improve prognosis.Copyright © 2023 IRBIS LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Only recently studies have been able to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of purification therapies in inflammatory diseases. Here we present the management of a young (21y) male patient in severe cardiogenic shock due to COVID-19 perymyocarditis admitted to the ICU at Bolzano Central Hospital. November 30th 2020 the patient developed high fever (>40 C) and diarrhea. After unsuccessfully being treated orally with a macrolide he was admitted to a peripheral hospital the 4th of December. The day after he deteriorated, required transfer to the ICU, endotracheal intubation and pharmacological cardiovascular support (Norepinephrine, Levosimendan). Antimicrobial treatment was started with piperacillin/tazobactam, linezolid and metronidazole. Despite multiple radiological and microbiological diagnostic attempts the origin of this severe septic shock remained unclear. December 6th the patient was transferred to Bolzano Central Hospital for VA-ECMO evaluation. Method(s): The transesophageal echocardiography revealed 15-20% of EF, lactate (5,2 mmol/l), cardiac enzymes (TropT 1400 mcg/l) and inflammatory parameters (PCT 35 ng/ml, IL-6 685 pg/ml) were elevated. We performed cardiac monitoring via Swan-Ganz catheter. The cardiac index was 1,6 l/min/m2. The peak dosage for Norepinephrine reached 7,5mg/h (1,47 mcg/kg/min). At Bolzano ICU we facilitate the pharmacological therapy with milrinone, vasopressin and low dose epinephrine. Furthermore, we impost continuous hemodiafiltration with CytoSorb filter. Result(s): Only hours after the start of filtration therapy the patient improved and we were able to gradually reduce catecholamine therapy, lactate values decreased. A VA-ECMO implantation was no more necessary. December 10th, we saw a stable patient without ventilatory or cardiovascular support, at echocardiography we revealed a normal EF. Conclusion(s): Clinically we saw a young patient in severe septic/cardiogenic shock due to perimyocarditis. Yet diagnostic attempts (CT-scan, multiple blood/urinary/liquor cultures) remained negative. Despite multiple negative PCR tests for SARS-CoV2 infection we performed specific immunoglobulin analysis and received a positive result for IgM. We therefore conclude on a COVID-19 associated perymyocarditis. Furthermore, this case illustrates the potential benefit of cytokine filtration and elimination in COVID-19 patients with altered IL6 levels.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Most modern healthcare systems are striving to improve patient outcomes in an evidence-based manner. Increasingly, performance metrics are seen as key tools for accurately measuring and improving patient outcomes and healthcare value.1 However, in order to achieve better outcomes, process measures need to be identified. Process measures are evidence-based, best practices metrics that can be measured and thus, used to identify if outcomes are being met. Good process measures can improve patient outcomes by reducing the amount of variation in care delivery. During the Covid-19 pandemic, vast quantities of data were generated while managing ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) on the ICU. Furthermore, there was as a concomitant evolution of treatment strategies, which made it exceedingly difficult to identify processes that were actually improving patient outcomes. Objective(s): The aim of our quality improvement project was to promote standardised high quality care for intubated Covid-19 patients by identifying potential quality indicators and trends in their management. It is our intention to expand on this work to report metrics on all severe acute respiratory failure patients. Method(s): 15 process metrics surrounding the early care of intubated of Covid-19 patients were selected via a consultant led review process and a literature review in an effort to identify markers of quality surrounding intubation on our ITU. The variables selected included: - P/F ratio 24 hours pre-intubation, CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) duration prior to intubation, Recording intubation location, Enhanced thromboprophylaxis prescribed, Permissive hypercapnia, Driving pressure documented, prone position and paralysis initiated if P/F ratio was less than 20 kPa, Echo post intubation. Result(s): Data surrounding the intubation of Covid-19 patients was collected over an 11 week period between September and November 2021. The data was collected in a standardised fashion from patient notes and nursing notes, then stored in an excel file. Our data showed more than half the patients admitted were either intubated on the ward or immediately following arrival onto our ICU, possible indicating a delay in admitting Covid-19 patients. Our data also demonstrated heterogeneity of duration in CPAP prior to intubation which may also indicate delayed intubation for these patients.2 Conclusion(s): Our data demonstrated a reasonable degree of heterogeneity in our approach to the early care of intubated Covid-19 Patients. Areas of concern highlighted were the number of patients intubated on the ward or immediately upon arrival to ITU, rather than admitting prior to deterioration (most likely due to bed pressure) and variation in post intubation respiratory sampling between invasive and non-invasive broncheoalveolar lavage. Ongoing PDSA (plan-do-study-act) cycling are in progress to refine the data collection processes and reporting for all severe acute respiratory failure patients.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Bronchiolitis is the most common cause for paediatric respiratory hospital admissions in young children in the UK.1 Following the relaxation of international SARS-Cov-2 lockdown measures a potential national surge in cases was predicted, highlighting a need for more collaborative working across core specialities.2 This prompted the use of the principles of Inter-Professional Education (IPE) to prepare and deliver an intervention to improve outcomes for these patients.3 Objectives: * To plan, deliver and evaluate an educational intervention focussed on improving the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to care for a sick child with bronchiolitis * To utilise the principles of IPE to improve competence and confidence across core specialities involved in the care of a sick child with bronchiolitis Methods: A team from the Adult Intensive Care Unit (AICU) and the Paediatric High Dependency Unit (PHDU) from the Royal Berkshire Hospital in Reading delivered an inter-professional teaching session focussed on caring for the sick child with bronchiolitis. The patient journey was utilised as a framework to teach the core knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to clinically manage a child from the Emergency Department (ED) to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Each session included a lecture about bronchiolitis - describing pathophysiology and how to recognise the deteriorating child;a skills and drills tutorial - highlighting the need for weight-based calculations for high flow nasal oxygen, intravenous fluids and drugs;and a practical simulation scenario - focussing on the stabilisation and management of a sick child awaiting retrieval to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Result(s): 135 healthcare professionals from a range of adult and paediatric disciplines involved in the care of children across the patient journey attended one of fourteen teaching sessions delivered between September to December 2021. Attendees completed a feedback questionnaire. One hundred and twenty-two (90%) reported an extremely high degree of satisfaction overall, with many saying they would recommend the teaching sessions to others. Areas of personal and professional development were highlighted across the following main themes: gaining theoretical knowledge;understanding key equipment;performing drug calculations;preparing for intubation and ventilation;assessing the need for chest physiotherapy techniques;and more collaborative team-working. Free text comments demonstrated that the attendees felt the teaching sessions: built confidence through the sharing of new or improved knowledge and skills;facilitated a safe space to practice using simulation;and provided the opportunity to learn about and from each other. Many of the attendees also commented on areas they wanted to reinforce and further develop in daily clinical practice as a direct result of the sessions. Conclusion(s): On-going evaluation is taking place as the teaching sessions continue throughout the year, facilitating the inclusion of additional inter-professional groups from across core specialities. These sessions have been used as a template for the development of further planned IPE with a more varied range of paediatric clinical cases and presentations. These will continue to build on the transferable knowledge and skills that increase competence and confidence in caring for the sick child whilst developing a more collaborative practice-ready workforce.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Peripartum women are at increased risk for severe illness with coronavirus disease (Covid-19) infection. Recent medical literature has drawn attention to the possible influence of COVID-19 on the course of pregnancies and its long-term effects.1-5 Objective: This case series aimed to observe the clinical course of peripartum women with confirmed Covid-19 admitted to a critical care unit in the North-west of England. Method(s): Since the start of the pandemic, all pregnant women with Covid-19 infection admitted to the critical care unit were monitored and followed up. Demographic profile, medical co-morbidities, treatment received, respiratory support and vaccination status were noted. Result(s): From March 2020 until February 2022, 8 women in our practice were shifted to the critical care unit post-partum in view of worsening work of breathing & increasing oxygen requirement after initial management in the delivery suite. All admissions were during the 3rd wave of the pandemic in the UK, between June to October 2021. 5 patients underwent Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia & 3 were shifted post normal vaginal delivery. Mean age in the study population was 33.25 years (SD +/- 3.99) and mean length of stay in the ICU was 6.62 days (SD +/- 3.99). Only one woman required intubation & mechanical ventilation for 10 days and the rest were managed on High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) hood and self-proning manoeuvres. 50% of the patients received Tocilizumab. All women were discharged home and there were no maternal deaths. Pre- admission none of the women were vaccinated, but on follow up 5 out of the 8 had completed their vaccination. All women were emotionally distraught due to being isolated from their family and new born. When reviewed at 12 weeks, one patient experienced post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and one had features of long Covid syndrome. On follow up, all new born babies were doing well. Conclusion(s): From the limited amount of data available, psychological stress was common to all patients. Being isolated from their new-born and family was the most difficult emotional aspect for the mothers in addition to finding it difficult to breathe and uncertainty about the future. Most mothers and new-born babies were discharged from the hospital without any serious complications. However, further observation and long term follow up is imperative. Use of guidelines in peripartum patients will aid in appropriate escalation of care. Key words: COVID-19, Pregnancy, Peri-partum, Long Covid syndrome.
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: COVID-19 still represents a lifethreatening disease in individuals with a specific genetic background. We successfully applied a new Machine Learning method on WES data to extract a set of coding variants relevant for COVID- 19 severity. We aim to identify personalized add-on therapy. Method(s): A subset of identified variants, "actionable" by repurposed drugs, were functionally tested by in vitro and in vivo experiments. Result(s): Males with either rare loss of function variants in the TLR7 gene or L412F polymorphism in the TLR3 gene benefit from IFN-gamma, which is specifically defective in activated PBMCs, restoring innate immunity. Females heterozygous for rare variants in the ADAMTS13 gene and males with D603N homozygous polymorphism in the SELP gene benefit from Caplacizumab, which reduces vWF aggregation and thrombus formation. Males with either the low-frequency gain of function variant T201M in CYP19A1 gene or with poly-Q repeats >=23 in the AR gene benefit from Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, which restores normal testosterone levels, reducing inflammation and which rescues male golden hamsters from severe COVID-19. Conclusion(s): By adding these commonly used drugs to standard of care of selected patients, the rate of intubation is expected to decrease consistently, especially in patients with high penetrance rare genetic markers, mitigating the effect of the pandemic with a significant impact on the healthcare system.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundIn COVID-19 severe disease course such as need of intensive care unit (ICU) as well as development of mortality is mainly due to cytokine storm.ObjectivesIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the high dose intravenous anakinra treatment response and outcome in patients with severe and critical COVID-19 compared to standard of care.MethodsThis retrospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. The study population consisted of two groups as follows;the patients receiving high dose intravenous anakinra (anakinra group) between 01.09.2021 and 01.02.2022 and the patients treated with standard of care (SoC, control group) as historical control group who were hospitalized between 01.07.2021 and 01.09.2021.ResultsAfter the propensity score 1:1 matching 79 patients in anakinra and 79 patients in SoC matched and included into the analysis. Mean±SD patient age was 67.4±16.7 and 67.1±16.3 years in anakinra and SoC group, respectively (p=0.9). Male gender was 38 (48.7 %) in anakinra and 36 (46.2 %) SoC (p=0.8). Overall, ICU admission was in 14.1 % (n=11) and 30.8 % (n=24) (p=0.013;OR: 6.2), intubation in 12.8 % (n=10) and 16.7 % (n=13) patients (p=0.5), 14.1 % (n=11) and 32.1 % (n=25) patients died in anakinra and control group, respectively (p=0.008;OR: 7.1)ConclusionIn our study mortality was lower in patients receiving anakinra compared to SoC. Intravenous high dose anakinra is safe and effective treatment in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.Table 1.Baseline clinical and laboratory features of patients receiving standard of care (SoC) and Anakinra before and after propensity score (PS) matchingBefore PS matchingAfter PS matchingVariablesAnakinra (n=148)SoC (n=114)p value (OR)Anakinra (n=78)SoC (n=78)p value (OR)Age (years) (mean±SD)66.8±1763.1±170.0967.4±16.767.1±16.30.9Gender, male (n, %)78 (52.7)45 (39.5)0.033 (4.5)38 (48.7)36 (46.2)0.8Duration of hospitalization (days) (median, IQR)11 (12)9 (7.3)0.027.5 (9)11 (8)0.01Comorbidities (n, %) Diabetes mellitus41/146 (28.1)39 (34.2)0.318 (23)31 (39.7)0.025 (5) Hypertension84/143 (58.7)64 (56)0.730 (61.5)50 (64)0.7 Coronary heart disease27/143 (19)24 (21)0.718 (23)20 (25.6)0.7 Heart failure18/143 (12.6)23 (20)0.114 (18)20 (25.6)0.24 Chronic renal failure31 (21)6 (5.3)<0.001 (13.06)15 (19)6 (7.7)0.035 (4.5) Chronic obstructive lung disease23/144 (16)19 (16.7)0.914 (18)15 (19)0.8 Dementia15/117 (12.8)2 (1.8)0.001 (10.4)3/61 (5)2 (2.6)0.5 Malignancy16/146 (11)8 (7)0.39 (11.5)6 (7.7)0.4 Immunosuppressive usage18/146 (12.3)2 (1.8)0.001 (10.08)5 (6.5)2 (2.6)0.2Disease severity (n, %) NIH score 3 (severe)57 (38.5)68 (59.6)0.001 (11.5)48 (61.5)44 (56.4)0.5 NIH score 4 (critical)91 (61.5)46 (40.4)30 (38.5)34 (43.6) mcHIS score (mean±SD)3.4±1.22.64±1.5<0.0012.9±13.1±1.30.2PS: Propensity score, SoC: Standard of care, OR: Odds ratio, SD: Standard deviation, IQR: Interquartile range, mcHIS: Modified Covid hyperinflammatory syndrome score, NIH: National Institute Health, ALT: Alanin aminotransferase, AST: Aspartate aminotransferaseTable 2.Outcomes of patients receiving SoC and Anakinra before and after PS matchingBefore PS matchingAfter PS matchingVariables (n, %)Anakinra (n=148)SoC (n=114)p value (OR)Anakinra (n=78)SoC (n=78)p value (OR)Pneumothorax3/134 (2.2)00.25*2/73 (2.7)00.5*Myocardial infarction3/132 (2.3)6 (5.3)0.32/72 (2.8)2/56 (3.6)1Pulmonary embolism4/134 (3)11 (9.6)0.034 (4.8)*3/73 (4.1)7 (9)0.3*Intensive care unit60 (40.5)25 (22)0.001 (10.2)11 (14.1)24 (30.8)0.013 (6.2)Intubation54 (36.5)13 (11.4)<0.001 (21.3)10 (12.8)13 (16.7)0.5Mortality56 (37.8)27 (23.7)0.015 (5.96)11 (14.1)25 (32.1)0.008 (7.1)PS: Propensity score, SoC: Standard of care, OR: Odds ratioREFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.